Form - the shape, size, mass, weight and visual appearance of something.
Function - the practical use and purpose in a design
Louis Henry Sullivan defined the style of form follows function, which conveys simplistic forms of buildings. He specifies that the best architecture is which that 'walks the fine line between Art and function'
Form follows functions is widely associated with modern day architecture and product design. The key aspect of the design is the purpose of the building or product and not the visual appearance which follows after.
In the seminar, we had a task to find any object that we were carrying, my object being an iPhone 5s charger, and think about the relationship between its form and its function. Which do you think has been given priority by its designer?
The priority of the iPhone charger has definitely been given to the function and rightly so. The charger doesn't need to look good or interesting, it just needs to simply be able to charge up the iPhone, which is all its function is.
How prevalent is the relationship between its from and function?
The design of the charger is very simple and plain, which follows the very simple function. People are not bothered about the aesthetics feature of the charger, however I think the aspects of the form of the product that has been well thought through is the shape and size of the product. The plugs are small enough to be able to fit into plug sockets behind tight and small gaps. Also the length of the wire is an average length for peoples needs.
Do you think that ‘The way something looks should be determined by its purpose’?
Yes, as the product needs to be the certain shape or to be able to be used for its function. Then I think the product needs to look as user friendly and be able to relate to the product as much as possible.